Game Title: Real Lives 2010
Play Features
Representation
Analysis
- Rules
- Organization-clear goals to be obtained by playing the game.
- Players
- Representation of reality through simulation.
- Chance
- Conflict
- Resolution
- Safety
- Amusement
- Interactive storylines
Strong Components of Real Lives 2010
The goal, working toward a long healthy and happy life, along with making decisions that can change the outcome, is quite clear. A single player or a possible small group of players, can work toward achieving the goal. The chance that something devastating will happen to your virtual family differs based on the encounters throughout the years. Conflict arises when there is devastation in your family, a gain, or loss of a job, an event that poses problems in the country, or a personal life experience. Choices are made by the players to resolve concerns that may arise regarding finances, love interests, and contributions to the community. These components provide for a safe learning environment building on prior knowledge; simulating the real world experiences through decision-making processes.
Weak Components of Real Lives 2010
Rules are somewhat clear and could use a more explicit approach for understanding the game better. While the players independently play the game and can click on family members to obtain more information, the virtual environment is missing. Some of the material becomes repetitive, which may be a component of the trial game. The game becomes lengthy at times, allowing for periods of needed intermission by the player. Therefore, the amusement level would be higher if there were a stronger storyline, more interactive components, and more chances to interact with the non-playing characters of the game.
Learner's Styles & Teaching/Learning Objectives
I would choose this game for late high school or a higher education level of students. Based on many components of the game, there are not many opportunities for interactions with other players or non-playing characters. The decisions are made solely by the individual player or possible partnering of no more than two players. Based on this information, I would choose the Assimilation Style of learning for the group that would enjoy this game.
The Assimilating learning preference is for a concise, logical approach. Ideas and concepts are more important than people. These people require good clear explanations rather than practical opportunity. They excel at understanding wide-ranging information and organizing it in a clear logical format. People with an Assimilating learning style are less focused on people and more interested in ideas and abstract concepts. People with this style are more attracted to logically sound theories than approaches based on practical value. This learning style person is important for effectiveness in information and science careers. In formal learning situations, people with this style prefer readings, lectures, exploring analytical models, and having time to think things through (http://www.businessballs.com/kolblearningstyles.htm).
Objectives for Real Lives 2010:
Decision-Making: analysis of knowledge based on problem solving, prediction, drawing conclusions, and choice making. During the game, choices are given over the course of a lifetime to enhance the opportunity of a healthy and happy life. Detailed situations give the game a real-life feel, and players have the chance to monitor their life choices visualized on a current graph.
Social/Cultural Awareness: understanding the social environment of others. The students take on the life of a person from a different country making decisions that will extend or end their lives based on current issues that are relative to that country. This narrative-based game provides opportunities to comprehend and reflect on decisions made related to the real world concerns. During the course of the game, reflection is necessary to continue with choices. Upon completion of the game, a death certificate is given. It reviews the major factors and decisions that were made throughout the player's lifetime.
Ability to Self-Assess: evaluation of one's own progress. Players can consistently evaluate and change their social status by looking at the assets that they have obtained through life. There are also opportunities to continually assess personal progress with a graph; however, I'm not sure how this graph plays into the game. I couldn't find much value to it, other than I could tell when I was getting close to ending my life. At the end of the game, there is an opportunity to reflect on the game process.
Implementation & Assessment
Settings
If the high school setting were set up in small group stations, as we do in the elementary level, a purchase of a Six Pack license would be needed. The cost for a Six Pack is $199; the price goes way up when looking at full lab packs of 30 or more students. The total cost can exceed $800 to complete the license requirements for a student lab. Computer labs would also require systems to have Windows 2000 or higher, 512 MB RAM, and 1024 x 768 graphics resolution.
Real Lives 2010 is aligned with the national standards. This program provides additional teacher resources in the form of lesson plans. Teacher lesson plans include cause and effect, comparing personal life to the virtual life of the game, discussion-starting questions to synthesize the knowledge learned while playing the game, journal discussions, and activity extensions.
Teachers, students, families, and community members that share this game are the primary stakeholders. To fully understand and obtain the true feeling behind the author's message, the players will need a basic knowledge of life skills. If players are lacking experiences of independent life skills, it will be difficult to gain the full simulation of empathy for the virtual characters of the game.
Procedure
One way to implement the game would be to help students to understand that an important part of geography is the cause and effect relationship between the natural environment and human beings. The environment directly impacts the ways in which people live and the ways in which people make a living. Have students work in pairs to research such topics as land use, natural resources, climate, and vegetation in their simulated birth countries.
Assessment
Ask students to present, one by one, oral summaries of the major events in their simulated lives and the related causes/effects. Help students process all of the information and relate it to their own lives with post activity discussions centered on life's events, causes, and effects --those that we can influence in a positive or negative way and those we can't. Assessment given in a rubric from would be helpful for both students and teachers to know the expectations of the final project.
Jen,
ReplyDeleteI was able to play Real Lives 2010 and learned that I came into the world as a little girl from India. I think I did quite well for myself (I lived to be 72 years old)! However, as I played the game, I found myself often saying how some of the topics were WAY too advanced for younger students (even sometimes for high schoolers). Subjects such as menstruation, sexual abuse, drug addiction, and others constantly surfaced that are generally not covered in content areas other than Health class. Perhaps the teacher lesson plans that accompany the purchase of Real Lives 2010 encompasses a list of all of the possible senarios that one can encounter while playing the game. However, some of these topics would be awkward for students who either have limited experience with them or who are not comfortable learning about the information based on how it relates to their personal lives.
I was born a little girl from Kenya and lived to be 79. I had 2 siblings that were both married and had children before the age of 16. I was not married until I was 62. Isn't that strange.
ReplyDeleteThe topics and questions asked did seem quite advanced, however, I guess if you are living in that country that is what they would deal with at a very early age. I could see some of the topics upsetting some students or even parents.
I had 4 siblings. All of them got married and had children in their twenties. However, I outlived everyone in my family, including my first husband. He died at the age of 28. I then remarried at the age of 58.
ReplyDeleteI also thought the statistics were very fascinating but quite repetitive. At the start of the game, I read everything. However, by the age of 30 I started to click quickly through some of the stats because they never changed.
This is a nice analysis, Jen. I'm wondering (I never taught high school kids) if a group compare/contrast might also work as an assessment. As I think about this more, I wonder if, instead of talking about one's own experiences they could collaborate on the decisions they made - say they were presented with the same event but made two different decisions with two very different results. It might be worth mentioning as a group presentation. hmmm... I could possibly do this for the Peacemaker game too.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to have to try Real Lives if only for kicks and giggles. I would like to venture to Germany. =)
I just noticed that you have "resolution" in your components. I never thought about that but I definitely do think a game must have resolution in order for it to be effective. I'm going to add it to my definition!
ReplyDeleteReading your blog I thought about the complexity of the game matters when you're thinking about engagement. You mention that Monopoly has a high level of engagement - this I can see and when compared to something like Hearts players may not be as engaged. Interesting to think about - the cognitive load matters with respect to communication and game engagement. My guess is when comparing the games (complex and simple) that the non-digital format which offers more time for conversation, taunting, and strategizing among players would be reduced in more complex games.
ReplyDelete